At church tomorrow we are launching our first two Viral Bibles.
The idea is to underline your favourite bible verse and record this on the web site - http://www.viralbibleproject.com/ The Viral Bible is a Biblefresh project launched during 2011.
Once you have done this you are invited to pass on the bible to someone else and they mark and record their verse before passing it on.
Tomorrow we have one bible for each congregation: Portpatrick and Stranraer: St Ninians; in coming weeks we will be asking members to register a bible they have to set off some other viral bibles.
What a great way to share the Word of God, let's see how far they can go!
Saturday, 31 December 2011
Tuesday, 13 September 2011
Living in the Church of Scotland 2
Following my earlier post I received a comment from James Miller which was supportive of the call to live in the Church of Scotland. James directed me to a post he made on his blog in July and I'm very happy to post a link to James' post here.
http://fivesidedchristian.blogspot.com/2011/07/why-evangelicals-should-stay-in-church.html
I would also commend for your interest the three talks given at a meeting held in Inverness East Church on 19th August. These talks can be downloaded from the Inverness East web site under sermons, or at this page
http://www.invernesseast.com/resources/sermons
Please pray for the Church of Scotland. Please work and serve to live in the Church of Scotland.
http://fivesidedchristian.blogspot.com/2011/07/why-evangelicals-should-stay-in-church.html
I would also commend for your interest the three talks given at a meeting held in Inverness East Church on 19th August. These talks can be downloaded from the Inverness East web site under sermons, or at this page
http://www.invernesseast.com/resources/sermons
Please pray for the Church of Scotland. Please work and serve to live in the Church of Scotland.
Living in the Church of Scotland
The following I received from a much admired minister, now friend, and hope it is helpful for you if I pass this on in this way.
A possible bible based response to the decision of the General Assembly of 2011
While
adhering to the bible as the supreme rule of faith and life
profoundly disagreeing with the decision of the General Assembly of 2011
and
affirming that decisions should be made on the basis of theological principle rather than individual situations
nevertheless being aware
that the preamble and questions at ordination are still bible-based and mission centred
that currently there is no interference with the faithful preaching of the word
that there are other issues which are absolutely central to the Christian faith and about which there can
be no possible “alternative interpretation”,
e.g. the uniqueness of the person and action of Jesus
of the importance of unity in so far as it is possible, e.g. in the NT there was clear firm resistance
against false teaching, but a reluctance to separate (bearing in mind the wheat and the tares)
of the opportunity of Christian witness provided in the parish system of the national church
therefore it is suggested
1. that every effort be made to take a clear stand for the Bible as the supreme rule of faith and life
2. that all ministers and elders remain in and actively take part in the Church of Scotland as presently structured to ensure the maximum number of votes at the General Assembly of 2013 and possible subsequent barrier procedure
3. that there be a faithfulness in prayer, especially for those who are in the “front-line” of difficulty e.g. on the theological commission and in the presbytery of Aberdeen
4. that, bearing in mind the question put at the ordination of ministers
“Are not zeal for the glory of God, love to the Lord Jesus Christ, and a desire for the salvation of men so far as you know your own heart, your great motives and chief inducements to enter into the office of the Holy Ministry?”
maximum energy be used for continued outreach to lost souls in our communities for whom we are answerable to the Lord
certainly until after the General Assembly of 2013.
A possible bible based response to the decision of the General Assembly of 2011
While
adhering to the bible as the supreme rule of faith and life
profoundly disagreeing with the decision of the General Assembly of 2011
and
affirming that decisions should be made on the basis of theological principle rather than individual situations
nevertheless being aware
that the preamble and questions at ordination are still bible-based and mission centred
that currently there is no interference with the faithful preaching of the word
that there are other issues which are absolutely central to the Christian faith and about which there can
be no possible “alternative interpretation”,
e.g. the uniqueness of the person and action of Jesus
of the importance of unity in so far as it is possible, e.g. in the NT there was clear firm resistance
against false teaching, but a reluctance to separate (bearing in mind the wheat and the tares)
of the opportunity of Christian witness provided in the parish system of the national church
therefore it is suggested
1. that every effort be made to take a clear stand for the Bible as the supreme rule of faith and life
2. that all ministers and elders remain in and actively take part in the Church of Scotland as presently structured to ensure the maximum number of votes at the General Assembly of 2013 and possible subsequent barrier procedure
3. that there be a faithfulness in prayer, especially for those who are in the “front-line” of difficulty e.g. on the theological commission and in the presbytery of Aberdeen
4. that, bearing in mind the question put at the ordination of ministers
“Are not zeal for the glory of God, love to the Lord Jesus Christ, and a desire for the salvation of men so far as you know your own heart, your great motives and chief inducements to enter into the office of the Holy Ministry?”
maximum energy be used for continued outreach to lost souls in our communities for whom we are answerable to the Lord
certainly until after the General Assembly of 2013.
Friday, 26 August 2011
A New Journal
While at the Tyndale Fellowship OT Study group I learned about this publication - The Journal of Theological Interpretation. It is new to me, although started publishing, twice annually, in 2007.
There is web information here.
Kevin Vanhoozer, one of the Editorial Board writes,
“The Journal of Theological Interpretation is a most welcome addition to a development that is as much Renaissance as Reformation: a recovery of ways of reading the Bible that, while not dismissing historical and literary concerns, go on to engage the word of God and thus to tear down the iron curtain that has for too long separated biblical studies and systematic theology. First a commentary series, then a Dictionary, and now a Journal. A three-stranded cord is not easily broken: the contemporary move towards the theological interpretation of the Bible is alive and well.”
The first copy I have is vol 5, no 1. This looks like being a very useful addition to our biblical studies tools, a good reminder of the need for our interpretation of Scripture to engage with theology at some point. So, well worth looking out for.
There is web information here.
Kevin Vanhoozer, one of the Editorial Board writes,
“The Journal of Theological Interpretation is a most welcome addition to a development that is as much Renaissance as Reformation: a recovery of ways of reading the Bible that, while not dismissing historical and literary concerns, go on to engage the word of God and thus to tear down the iron curtain that has for too long separated biblical studies and systematic theology. First a commentary series, then a Dictionary, and now a Journal. A three-stranded cord is not easily broken: the contemporary move towards the theological interpretation of the Bible is alive and well.”
The first copy I have is vol 5, no 1. This looks like being a very useful addition to our biblical studies tools, a good reminder of the need for our interpretation of Scripture to engage with theology at some point. So, well worth looking out for.
Wednesday, 24 August 2011
Embracing The Trinity
Here's another book I brought home from Cambridge (and for the avoidance of doubt, I didn't already have a copy of this one!)
Fred Sanders 'Embracing The Trinity' is on the whole a good book, if not especially easy to read. At least it is a timely reminder to Evangelicals of our Trinitarian roots and a need to have Trinitarian thinking well embedded in our theology and practice of Christian living.
Sanders writes that the Trinity isn't for anything, the Trinity is God. (page 61). So, even to ask, 'What is the Trinity for?' is to misunderstand what God is revealing of himself when he reveals his Trinitarian nature to us.
The best chapter is chapter 4 'The Shape of the Gospel'. In this long chapter Sanders clearly relates the Trinity to all of the Gospel in a most helpful way. On p. 136-141 writing of the work of the Holy Spirit in the Gospel Sanders uses the phrase 'the Holy Spirit puts us in our place'. This is not used to demean but to teach us that the Holy Spirit, by his powerful indwelling work, places us within the Gospel story.
One final point, writing (page 113) on the depth of the Gospel and of '"head" Christians who mistakenly believe that being "theologically correct" is the sum and substance of Christian living.' and quoting Henry Scougal we read:
Scougal indicts, I consider these "orthodox notions" believers to be the nearest to the real thing, but for that reason they are probably the most thoroughly trapped. If you tell one of these top-heavy believers that they are missing out on the reality of salvation, they will immediately make room in their intellectual systerm for a doctrine about "the reality of salvation." They earnestly seek to embrace all God's truth, but if you tell them they are missing the power of godliness, they will buy (or write) a book about it. dp a Bible study about it, or in some other way try to put together a proper doctine about it.
Indeed!
On the whole a good book. Not to be recommended to young Christians or those without some theological background or interest.
Fred Sanders 'Embracing The Trinity' is on the whole a good book, if not especially easy to read. At least it is a timely reminder to Evangelicals of our Trinitarian roots and a need to have Trinitarian thinking well embedded in our theology and practice of Christian living.
Sanders writes that the Trinity isn't for anything, the Trinity is God. (page 61). So, even to ask, 'What is the Trinity for?' is to misunderstand what God is revealing of himself when he reveals his Trinitarian nature to us.
The best chapter is chapter 4 'The Shape of the Gospel'. In this long chapter Sanders clearly relates the Trinity to all of the Gospel in a most helpful way. On p. 136-141 writing of the work of the Holy Spirit in the Gospel Sanders uses the phrase 'the Holy Spirit puts us in our place'. This is not used to demean but to teach us that the Holy Spirit, by his powerful indwelling work, places us within the Gospel story.
One final point, writing (page 113) on the depth of the Gospel and of '"head" Christians who mistakenly believe that being "theologically correct" is the sum and substance of Christian living.' and quoting Henry Scougal we read:
Scougal indicts, I consider these "orthodox notions" believers to be the nearest to the real thing, but for that reason they are probably the most thoroughly trapped. If you tell one of these top-heavy believers that they are missing out on the reality of salvation, they will immediately make room in their intellectual systerm for a doctrine about "the reality of salvation." They earnestly seek to embrace all God's truth, but if you tell them they are missing the power of godliness, they will buy (or write) a book about it. dp a Bible study about it, or in some other way try to put together a proper doctine about it.
Indeed!
On the whole a good book. Not to be recommended to young Christians or those without some theological background or interest.
Tuesday, 23 August 2011
Edinburgh Dogmatics Conference
On Monday eveing, the 14th Edinburgh Dogmatics Conference opens. The theme this year is sanctification and the programme includes papers by Oliver O'Donovan, Bruce McCormack, Michael Horton and Henri Blocher, and others.
I recently received the following note from Rutherford House:
If you can't join us for the entire 2011 Edinburgh Dogmatics Conference, we hope you will join us for a free evening session with
Professor Ivor Davidson (University of St Andrews).
Prof Davidson will be presenting a paper on 'Gospel Holiness' for our conference theme: The Doctrine of Sanctification. Tuesday 30 August 2011, 7:00pm, Martin Hall - New College
RSVP to Rachel Ehorn at rehorn@rutherfordhouse.org.uk to reserve your spot!
There is still room to join us at New College this August for the Dogmatics Conference. This year’s theme is sanctification, and we are again privileged to have some top class speakers joining us. Speakers include Oliver O'Donovan, Michael Horton, Bruce McCormack, Ivor Davidson, Henri Blocher, Derek Tidball, Richard Lints, Julie Canlis, Grant MacAskill and Kelly Kapic. The cost for the conference is £80.
Register through our website and we look forward to seeing you there!
If you haven't registered, why not join us for what I expect will be a really good conference this year.
A Review in Life and Work
In the September Life and Work my review of Stephen Kuhrt's book 'Tom Wright for Everyone' was published. I know that there are constraints of space in L&W, however some of the editorial changes left the review making less than obvious sense. Here is a copy of my review as submitted. (see my earlier post here)
Tom Wright for Everyone:
Putting the theology of N. T. Wright into practice in the local Church
Stephen Kuhrt
SPCK: 2011
xiv+108 pages
Biblography 20 pages; Notes 11 pages; Indices 7 pages
It is surely too soon for a thorough review of the theology of NT Wright, not least since we still await some crucial elements of that theology to be published. However, Stephen Kuhrt does great service both to NT Wright, and to the church in this brief volume.
An opening chapter helpfully reviews the career of NT Wright as scholar, theologian and Churchman. This is followed by a chapter outlining Kuhrt’s own story and his interest in NT Wright. In this chapter Kuhrt, writing from an evangelical Anglican tradition Kuhrt poses some thoughtful questions to that evangelical tradition which still await an answer. Of course, he goes on to suggest the NT Wright does begin to offer an answer to these questions. This chapter should not be passed over by readers of Life and Work, as the questions raised by Kuhrt reflect questions that need to be asked and answered by an evangelical reformed/Presbyterian tradition just as much as by evangelicals within the Anglican tradition.
The central chapter of the book somewhat optimistically offers ‘A summary of the theology of N. T. Wright’. A seemingly impossible task which is well attempted by Kuhrt, using the device of taking 39 words or phrases around which key elements of Wright’s theology can be gathered. As good as this chapter is it should not be a substitute for reading Wright, his work on Christian hope, Jesus and the Kingdom, Paul and Gospel especially. In Kuhrt’s brief concluding summary we read of Wright’s proposal that,
In its reading of the New Testament, the Christian Church needs to shed the dualist lens introduced by the Gnostics … the recovery of a properly Jewish theology of creation that will enable us to understand Jesus as coming to inaugurate that new creation and renew the world rather than destroy it. … the Church’s role is to live within the story of Scripture, demonstrating, by word and deed, radical and Spirit-filled signs of the resurrection life that Jesus Christ has come to bring. (page 64)
Stephen Kuhrt has been vicar at a Church of England congregation in New Malden since 2007. The exciting conclusion to this volume is his account of the impact of Wright’s theology upon the life and ministry of this congregation. In three chapters Kuhrt gives accounts of changes in pastoral work, mission activity, worship and sacramental ministry, development of Christian character and the involvement of the people of God in active service. While some parts of this will be familiar to readers of Life and Work, using Wright, Kuhrt gives a deep biblical and theological foundation for these revisions of the life and ministry of a congregation. In his concluding chapters Kuhrt writes wisely and sensitively about both the ministry of women and responding to the challenge of homosexuality and these passages I hope will prove very helpful within our present situation.
Kuhrt writes well, this is a short and easily read book. Writing as an evangelical Kuhrt brings a great challenge from the theology of NT Wright to all evangelicals. If you don’t like his answers you at least have to answer his questions. For non evangelicals I think Kuhrt’s book demonstrates the vitality of evangelical theology and practice when it is radically committed to being biblical rather than entrenched in a nineteenth century form of a sixteenth century tradition! While commending this book most warmly I would nevertheless more warmly commend a long and detailed engagement with Tom Wright (and am sure that Stephen Kuhrt would agree with this).
Tom Wright for Everyone:
Putting the theology of N. T. Wright into practice in the local Church
Stephen Kuhrt
SPCK: 2011
xiv+108 pages
Biblography 20 pages; Notes 11 pages; Indices 7 pages
It is surely too soon for a thorough review of the theology of NT Wright, not least since we still await some crucial elements of that theology to be published. However, Stephen Kuhrt does great service both to NT Wright, and to the church in this brief volume.
An opening chapter helpfully reviews the career of NT Wright as scholar, theologian and Churchman. This is followed by a chapter outlining Kuhrt’s own story and his interest in NT Wright. In this chapter Kuhrt, writing from an evangelical Anglican tradition Kuhrt poses some thoughtful questions to that evangelical tradition which still await an answer. Of course, he goes on to suggest the NT Wright does begin to offer an answer to these questions. This chapter should not be passed over by readers of Life and Work, as the questions raised by Kuhrt reflect questions that need to be asked and answered by an evangelical reformed/Presbyterian tradition just as much as by evangelicals within the Anglican tradition.
The central chapter of the book somewhat optimistically offers ‘A summary of the theology of N. T. Wright’. A seemingly impossible task which is well attempted by Kuhrt, using the device of taking 39 words or phrases around which key elements of Wright’s theology can be gathered. As good as this chapter is it should not be a substitute for reading Wright, his work on Christian hope, Jesus and the Kingdom, Paul and Gospel especially. In Kuhrt’s brief concluding summary we read of Wright’s proposal that,
In its reading of the New Testament, the Christian Church needs to shed the dualist lens introduced by the Gnostics … the recovery of a properly Jewish theology of creation that will enable us to understand Jesus as coming to inaugurate that new creation and renew the world rather than destroy it. … the Church’s role is to live within the story of Scripture, demonstrating, by word and deed, radical and Spirit-filled signs of the resurrection life that Jesus Christ has come to bring. (page 64)
Stephen Kuhrt has been vicar at a Church of England congregation in New Malden since 2007. The exciting conclusion to this volume is his account of the impact of Wright’s theology upon the life and ministry of this congregation. In three chapters Kuhrt gives accounts of changes in pastoral work, mission activity, worship and sacramental ministry, development of Christian character and the involvement of the people of God in active service. While some parts of this will be familiar to readers of Life and Work, using Wright, Kuhrt gives a deep biblical and theological foundation for these revisions of the life and ministry of a congregation. In his concluding chapters Kuhrt writes wisely and sensitively about both the ministry of women and responding to the challenge of homosexuality and these passages I hope will prove very helpful within our present situation.
Kuhrt writes well, this is a short and easily read book. Writing as an evangelical Kuhrt brings a great challenge from the theology of NT Wright to all evangelicals. If you don’t like his answers you at least have to answer his questions. For non evangelicals I think Kuhrt’s book demonstrates the vitality of evangelical theology and practice when it is radically committed to being biblical rather than entrenched in a nineteenth century form of a sixteenth century tradition! While commending this book most warmly I would nevertheless more warmly commend a long and detailed engagement with Tom Wright (and am sure that Stephen Kuhrt would agree with this).
Monday, 22 August 2011
Compassionate Convictions
On Saturday it was 2 years since the release, on compassionate grounds, of Abdelbasset al Megrahi, the only person so far convicted of the Lockerbie bombing.
I posted earlier on this in 2009, here and here.
I hope all Christians have strong convictions about compassion. Has al Megrahi survived longer than expected - yes. By what measure of compassion does this disappoint us?
Given the information available to the Scottish Government at the time I remain convinced they were right to release al Megrahi. And if similar circumstance arise in future I hope similar compassion will be shown.
Our society is judged by the way we treat our convits, and also by the values of our convictions. Better to be judged for compassion than a lack of compassion.
I posted earlier on this in 2009, here and here.
I hope all Christians have strong convictions about compassion. Has al Megrahi survived longer than expected - yes. By what measure of compassion does this disappoint us?
Given the information available to the Scottish Government at the time I remain convinced they were right to release al Megrahi. And if similar circumstance arise in future I hope similar compassion will be shown.
Our society is judged by the way we treat our convits, and also by the values of our convictions. Better to be judged for compassion than a lack of compassion.
Monday, 15 August 2011
A Theologian's Memoir
Before going off to Cambridge in early July I read Stanley Hauerwas' Hannah's Child: A Theologian's Memoir. This is the first book by Hauerwas I've read and it won't be the last.
This memoir is more of a theological reflection upon his story than what we would know by the literary genre of biography. Here are some passages I noted on the way through.
p. 52 writing about our use of language to talk about God
our language about God is necessarily analogical, which means that theology has the task of helping the church not say more about God than needs to be said.
In Jan 1999 I heard Jim Packer speaking about analogical use of language, and that he preferred this description to allegorical language. Of especial interest in the Hauerwas quote is the notion of not saying more about God than needs to be said. Reformed theologians have often been accused of this, no sense of mystery and a great desire to explain everything. These are temptations we need to resist.
p. 59 on the task of theology
The presumption of many scholars at the time was that the task of theology was to make the language of the faith amenable to standards set by the world. ... From my perspective, if the language was not true, then you ought to give it up. I thought the crucial question was not whether Christianity could be made amendable to the world, but could the world be made amenable to what Christians believe?
Well said. Too often we are asked to change the faith, to change our understanding of God and his gospel to make it fit in with what the world likes and wants. This must be resisted - I hope many in the Church of Scotland wake up to this point!
p. 158 on creation
That something had to start it all is not what Christians mean by creation. Creation is not "back there", though there is a "back there" character to creation. Rather, creation names God's continuing action, God's unrelenting desire for us to want to be loved by that love manifest in Christ's life, death and resurrection.
Not only back there, but not less than back there. If the first article of the Creed is not true we are adrift in a universe without purpose or future.
All in all a good book which I warmly commend. If you've read Hauerwas, where should I start?
This memoir is more of a theological reflection upon his story than what we would know by the literary genre of biography. Here are some passages I noted on the way through.
p. 52 writing about our use of language to talk about God
our language about God is necessarily analogical, which means that theology has the task of helping the church not say more about God than needs to be said.
In Jan 1999 I heard Jim Packer speaking about analogical use of language, and that he preferred this description to allegorical language. Of especial interest in the Hauerwas quote is the notion of not saying more about God than needs to be said. Reformed theologians have often been accused of this, no sense of mystery and a great desire to explain everything. These are temptations we need to resist.
p. 59 on the task of theology
The presumption of many scholars at the time was that the task of theology was to make the language of the faith amenable to standards set by the world. ... From my perspective, if the language was not true, then you ought to give it up. I thought the crucial question was not whether Christianity could be made amendable to the world, but could the world be made amenable to what Christians believe?
Well said. Too often we are asked to change the faith, to change our understanding of God and his gospel to make it fit in with what the world likes and wants. This must be resisted - I hope many in the Church of Scotland wake up to this point!
p. 158 on creation
That something had to start it all is not what Christians mean by creation. Creation is not "back there", though there is a "back there" character to creation. Rather, creation names God's continuing action, God's unrelenting desire for us to want to be loved by that love manifest in Christ's life, death and resurrection.
Not only back there, but not less than back there. If the first article of the Creed is not true we are adrift in a universe without purpose or future.
All in all a good book which I warmly commend. If you've read Hauerwas, where should I start?
Friday, 12 August 2011
The Bible's Central Story
Here's another book; yes, I got this one at Tyndale (and no I don't already have a copy) and yes, I read it already.
Chris Wright Salvation Belongs to our God is a book that used Rev 7:9-10 as the key to open the big story of the bible, or perhaps the big story of God's mission.
This is an excellent book and I would commend it to any Christian who is willing to do some serious thinking and bible reading to understand better the salvation that belongs to our God.
Chris Wright offers, in chapter 1, a very helpful overview of the use of 'salvation' words in both OT and NT, leaving us with a much bigger view of salvation than merely 'the forgiveness of my sins', although salvation is not less than this it is much more.
Salvation is then set in the context of God's unique identity, his covenant blessing and story and our experience of salvation.
The longest chapter in the book is on Salvation and the sovereignty of God, this is a chapter that will repay serious study and re reading. Wright sets all the nations under the sovereignty of God and therefore in need of the message of God's salvation. Wright tackles the question of the destiny of the unevangelised by asking 'do we need to know of God's salvation and our part in it before God can save us?' I would rephrase - are we saved by the knowledge of salvation or by the work of Christ on the cross? If the latter then how does this impact our thinking about those who have never heard the gospel? Clearly a sovereign God can choose to save anyone, even if they have not heard the gospel. This however does not reduce the urgency of our need to tell the world of God's salvation.
Once again, thanks to Chris Wright for this helpful and timely book.
Chris Wright Salvation Belongs to our God is a book that used Rev 7:9-10 as the key to open the big story of the bible, or perhaps the big story of God's mission.
This is an excellent book and I would commend it to any Christian who is willing to do some serious thinking and bible reading to understand better the salvation that belongs to our God.
Chris Wright offers, in chapter 1, a very helpful overview of the use of 'salvation' words in both OT and NT, leaving us with a much bigger view of salvation than merely 'the forgiveness of my sins', although salvation is not less than this it is much more.
Salvation is then set in the context of God's unique identity, his covenant blessing and story and our experience of salvation.
The longest chapter in the book is on Salvation and the sovereignty of God, this is a chapter that will repay serious study and re reading. Wright sets all the nations under the sovereignty of God and therefore in need of the message of God's salvation. Wright tackles the question of the destiny of the unevangelised by asking 'do we need to know of God's salvation and our part in it before God can save us?' I would rephrase - are we saved by the knowledge of salvation or by the work of Christ on the cross? If the latter then how does this impact our thinking about those who have never heard the gospel? Clearly a sovereign God can choose to save anyone, even if they have not heard the gospel. This however does not reduce the urgency of our need to tell the world of God's salvation.
Once again, thanks to Chris Wright for this helpful and timely book.
Thursday, 11 August 2011
Another book on prayer
I picked up this book at Keswick by Philip Jensen and Tony Payne Prayer and the Voice of God. Their earlier book Guidance and the Voice of God (or as I heard Jensen refer to it 'The Last Word on God's Guidance: Revised Edition') is an excellent book and well worth looking out for. I think I've loaned my copy to someone and it hasn't found it's way home yet!
This book on prayer is ok, I wouldn't commend it but wouldn't be worried if I saw someone reading it.
I haven't done the word count (I'm not that sad) but on reading the book the impression is that the word 'sin' appears almost as frequently as the word 'prayer'. I live daily with the reality of sin in my own life, I know that sin is a cause of prayerlessness, but the constant repitition of this theme is discouraging. If it had been mentioned clearly and powerfully once that would be more effective, in my opinion.
The highlights of the book are chapters 4 and 5.
Chapter 4 - Why we don't pray:
1) we have false views of God - he doesn't want to answer prayer;
2) there are things in our life we believe God can't do anything about;
3) we doubt God's goodness, generosity;
4) we don't beleive we are praying in the right way.
Chapter 5 - How to pray:
1) as dependent sons (those who inherit the Father's blessing);
2) by the Spirit;
3) through the Son;
4) to the Father;
5) with thanksgiving.
A few study or sermon series on prayer in there.
This book on prayer is ok, I wouldn't commend it but wouldn't be worried if I saw someone reading it.
I haven't done the word count (I'm not that sad) but on reading the book the impression is that the word 'sin' appears almost as frequently as the word 'prayer'. I live daily with the reality of sin in my own life, I know that sin is a cause of prayerlessness, but the constant repitition of this theme is discouraging. If it had been mentioned clearly and powerfully once that would be more effective, in my opinion.
The highlights of the book are chapters 4 and 5.
Chapter 4 - Why we don't pray:
1) we have false views of God - he doesn't want to answer prayer;
2) there are things in our life we believe God can't do anything about;
3) we doubt God's goodness, generosity;
4) we don't beleive we are praying in the right way.
Chapter 5 - How to pray:
1) as dependent sons (those who inherit the Father's blessing);
2) by the Spirit;
3) through the Son;
4) to the Father;
5) with thanksgiving.
A few study or sermon series on prayer in there.
Wednesday, 10 August 2011
A Better Answer
At 7pm this evening, and through this week, I will be joining with others using the Evangelical Alliance call to prayer in response to riots in England - call to prayer.
This time of rioting and violence seems to have started on Friday last week, see bbc news, when violence broke out during, or near the end, of a protest, which had been peaceful following the death on Thursday of Mr Mark Duggan. As a community we need to find a better answer.
Poverty is not an excuse for violence
If it is claimed that there is poverty in our land, this cannot be denied, some parts of London are 300 times wealthier than others. Poverty is an offence in our socieity which should be robustly addressed, but poverty will never be an excuse for violence.
Injustice is not an excuse for violence
The original protesters were calling for justice following the shooting of Mr Duggan. The cause of justice will never be served by violence. The bereaved family of Mr Duggan will not be comforted to know that other families have been bereaved, that homes and shops have been looted and burned.
Violence is always the wrong answer
The most commonly called for response on radio phone in's or social media sites is for state sponsored violence against the rioters. To respond with violence will only reinforce the perception that violence works. We may succeed in restoring order to the street for a while with water cannon and other violent means, but we will not resolve the underlying issues. There is a myth of 'peace' following violence which we need to lay bear. 'The fight back' (David Cameron's phrase) is the wrong phrase, implying the wrong answer.
There is a better way. Do to others as you would have them do to you. Love others first, without thought of self-benefit. Humility promotes justice. Passive, non-violent protest is always better. The way to fix what is wrong with our society is to build new communities.
I hope that all Christians will unite in prayer for our communities in these days; may God have mercy upon us all.
This time of rioting and violence seems to have started on Friday last week, see bbc news, when violence broke out during, or near the end, of a protest, which had been peaceful following the death on Thursday of Mr Mark Duggan. As a community we need to find a better answer.
Poverty is not an excuse for violence
If it is claimed that there is poverty in our land, this cannot be denied, some parts of London are 300 times wealthier than others. Poverty is an offence in our socieity which should be robustly addressed, but poverty will never be an excuse for violence.
Injustice is not an excuse for violence
The original protesters were calling for justice following the shooting of Mr Duggan. The cause of justice will never be served by violence. The bereaved family of Mr Duggan will not be comforted to know that other families have been bereaved, that homes and shops have been looted and burned.
Violence is always the wrong answer
The most commonly called for response on radio phone in's or social media sites is for state sponsored violence against the rioters. To respond with violence will only reinforce the perception that violence works. We may succeed in restoring order to the street for a while with water cannon and other violent means, but we will not resolve the underlying issues. There is a myth of 'peace' following violence which we need to lay bear. 'The fight back' (David Cameron's phrase) is the wrong phrase, implying the wrong answer.
There is a better way. Do to others as you would have them do to you. Love others first, without thought of self-benefit. Humility promotes justice. Passive, non-violent protest is always better. The way to fix what is wrong with our society is to build new communities.
I hope that all Christians will unite in prayer for our communities in these days; may God have mercy upon us all.
Monday, 8 August 2011
Holy Spirit Questions
At Cambridge I bought a few IVP books, this one is a Apollos book by Graham A Cole Engaging With The Holy Spirit.
Originally delivered as the Oak Hall annual theology lectures 2006, this short book takes six questions about the Holy Spirit, one each chapter.
The best thing about this book is Graham's clear method of study. Each chapter follows the same outline:
the witness of previous generations of scholars is reviewed;
then the biblical testimony is explored;
then a theological reflection is offered, 'the import of the issue for Christian life and ministry today' (page 31).
This is a good book and I would commend it to anyone. I found Graham's chapter on 'Ought we to pray to the Holy Spirit' most helpful in that it opened up a topic that often needs addressing. Graham concludes that Christians may pray to the Holy Spirit but are under no obligation to pray to the Holy Spirit. We are under obligation to pray to the Father, and to the Son, but not to the Holy Spirit - although we may if so led.
Originally delivered as the Oak Hall annual theology lectures 2006, this short book takes six questions about the Holy Spirit, one each chapter.
The best thing about this book is Graham's clear method of study. Each chapter follows the same outline:
the witness of previous generations of scholars is reviewed;
then the biblical testimony is explored;
then a theological reflection is offered, 'the import of the issue for Christian life and ministry today' (page 31).
This is a good book and I would commend it to anyone. I found Graham's chapter on 'Ought we to pray to the Holy Spirit' most helpful in that it opened up a topic that often needs addressing. Graham concludes that Christians may pray to the Holy Spirit but are under no obligation to pray to the Holy Spirit. We are under obligation to pray to the Father, and to the Son, but not to the Holy Spirit - although we may if so led.
Friday, 5 August 2011
Operation World
At Keswick this year I got a copy of the new, 7th edition, of Operation World. So my old 6th edition has now entered its rest, or it recycling!
I think every Christian should have a copy and use this resource regularly to pray for the world.
You can purchase copies of the book at the web site - here.
In using the book I am repeatedly saddened by the church statistics given. For example:
Japan - 1.54% Christian; Denominations - 2 Orthodox; 1 Catholic; 1 Anglican; 155 Protestant and 37 Independent
Malawi - 76% Christian; Denominations - 1 Orthodox; 1 Catholic; 1 Anglican; 62 Protestant and 331 Independent
Now I know that we would want to count Anglican as Protestant, but that only makes things worse. How can we not be ashamed of this division and disunity between Protestants. And just in case you think the UK is any better
UK - 59% Christian; Denominations - 20 Orthodox; 6 Catholic; 4 Anglican; 194 Protestant and 279 Independent.
This is not a complaint against Operation World, rather with thanks for making this information available a call to prayer and work for greater Protestant unity and an end to making new denominations!
I think every Christian should have a copy and use this resource regularly to pray for the world.
You can purchase copies of the book at the web site - here.
In using the book I am repeatedly saddened by the church statistics given. For example:
Japan - 1.54% Christian; Denominations - 2 Orthodox; 1 Catholic; 1 Anglican; 155 Protestant and 37 Independent
Malawi - 76% Christian; Denominations - 1 Orthodox; 1 Catholic; 1 Anglican; 62 Protestant and 331 Independent
Now I know that we would want to count Anglican as Protestant, but that only makes things worse. How can we not be ashamed of this division and disunity between Protestants. And just in case you think the UK is any better
UK - 59% Christian; Denominations - 20 Orthodox; 6 Catholic; 4 Anglican; 194 Protestant and 279 Independent.
This is not a complaint against Operation World, rather with thanks for making this information available a call to prayer and work for greater Protestant unity and an end to making new denominations!
Thursday, 4 August 2011
Another word on the last word
This is my second post on Brian McLaren's book The Last Word and the Word After That - see earlier here.
I finished the book in June before going to Cambridge, but haven't had time to post further since then, until now!
I find the narrative style of this book and others in the New Kind of Christian Trilogy both engaging and frustrating. It is an easy to read kind of book, even if the characters are one dimensional serving clearly defined narrative roles. I continually want to say things like, 'Yes, I know some evangelicals have treated people badly, but we aren't all like this'. See McLaren presentation of Dan's treatment by the church leadership and Jess' experience at Campus fellowship in chapter 4. You can't dismiss evangelical Christianity by picking on its worst examples and tarring the whole with that brush!
I do like and appreciate McLaren's questions and challenges, see earlier post.
I really liked the exchange on pages 178-179
[Neil tells Dan] "Truth be told, these are the people I know with."
"'Know with'?" I [Dan] asked.
"Haven't you noticed how learning and knowing are ultimately communal experiences, social experiences?" he [Neil] asked in reply.
Yes, I give thanks to God for communities in which I have learned and in which I continue to learn.
A last word then. I'm not sure what this book actually concludes about hell. I think McLaren seems to suggests that whether you believe in hell or don't doesn't really matter so long as you don't make hell the main thing in your scheme of Christian doctrine. I suspect that if you began in a different place from this narrative, let's say a consideration of justice, you might end up with a different answer.
I'm hoping to read Rob Bell's book Love Wins sometime soon so no doubt will have further to post on this in future.
I finished the book in June before going to Cambridge, but haven't had time to post further since then, until now!
I find the narrative style of this book and others in the New Kind of Christian Trilogy both engaging and frustrating. It is an easy to read kind of book, even if the characters are one dimensional serving clearly defined narrative roles. I continually want to say things like, 'Yes, I know some evangelicals have treated people badly, but we aren't all like this'. See McLaren presentation of Dan's treatment by the church leadership and Jess' experience at Campus fellowship in chapter 4. You can't dismiss evangelical Christianity by picking on its worst examples and tarring the whole with that brush!
I do like and appreciate McLaren's questions and challenges, see earlier post.
I really liked the exchange on pages 178-179
[Neil tells Dan] "Truth be told, these are the people I know with."
"'Know with'?" I [Dan] asked.
"Haven't you noticed how learning and knowing are ultimately communal experiences, social experiences?" he [Neil] asked in reply.
Yes, I give thanks to God for communities in which I have learned and in which I continue to learn.
A last word then. I'm not sure what this book actually concludes about hell. I think McLaren seems to suggests that whether you believe in hell or don't doesn't really matter so long as you don't make hell the main thing in your scheme of Christian doctrine. I suspect that if you began in a different place from this narrative, let's say a consideration of justice, you might end up with a different answer.
I'm hoping to read Rob Bell's book Love Wins sometime soon so no doubt will have further to post on this in future.
Wednesday, 3 August 2011
Tyndale House and Fellowship
First week in July I was at the Tyndale Fellowship Old Testament Study Group, two days studying Deuteronomy with 30-40 other evangelical scholars.
This was my first time at Tyndale and first time in Cambridge - I really enjoyed both.
I bought Tom Noble's book on the history of Tyndale Research for the Academy and the Church Tyndale House and Fellowship The First Sixty Years. I enjoyed this book and it is good to commend a book by a friend of St Ninians Stranraer.
The principle that led to establishing Tyndale House and Fellowship was good and remains sound today - there is a need for evangelicals to engage in rigourous biblical studies. It is good that those associated with Tyndale House over the years: e.g. FF Bruce, Howard Marshall, Jim Packer and David Wright (to name just a few) have all demonstrated in first rate scholarly work that it is possible to combine a submission to Scripture as God's word with an academic engagement with biblical studies, and other disciplines.
It is too easy for evangelials to retreat into church history or systematic theology and abandon academic study of the bible, but this must not be allowed to happen.
The work of Tyndale House, the Tyndale Fellowship is of great value to the church and should be supported by all who love the God and Father of the Lord Jesus Christ who made himself known in his word.
This was my first time at Tyndale and first time in Cambridge - I really enjoyed both.
I bought Tom Noble's book on the history of Tyndale Research for the Academy and the Church Tyndale House and Fellowship The First Sixty Years. I enjoyed this book and it is good to commend a book by a friend of St Ninians Stranraer.
The principle that led to establishing Tyndale House and Fellowship was good and remains sound today - there is a need for evangelicals to engage in rigourous biblical studies. It is good that those associated with Tyndale House over the years: e.g. FF Bruce, Howard Marshall, Jim Packer and David Wright (to name just a few) have all demonstrated in first rate scholarly work that it is possible to combine a submission to Scripture as God's word with an academic engagement with biblical studies, and other disciplines.
It is too easy for evangelials to retreat into church history or systematic theology and abandon academic study of the bible, but this must not be allowed to happen.
The work of Tyndale House, the Tyndale Fellowship is of great value to the church and should be supported by all who love the God and Father of the Lord Jesus Christ who made himself known in his word.
John Stott 1921-2011
Last Wednesday at the evening celebration at Keswick we were told of the death that afternoon of John Stott. I'm not posting a full tribute to John, I never met him and never heard him preach or teach. For tributes see here - at the All Soul's web site; here - LICC web site; or here - Langham Partnership International web site.
In my opinion John Stott has been the most significant evangelical leader of the twentieth century and I want to offer a few comments of thanks for his ministry.
John Stott: a careful bible student - John Stott's contributions to the Bible Speaks Today series should be well known and well used by preachers and bible teachers. They display a slow and careful reading of the text of Scripture, set in its context and then applied to our lives today. Stott regularly pursues words through lexical study and concordance study to bring a full and clear sense of the word into his exposition of the passage.
John Stott: a reader of our culture - John Stott promoted double listening, a listening to the Bible as God's word and also a listening to the world, the culture so that the preacher might speak God's word into their culture with precision and power. The Bible in one hand and the newspaper in the other is a lesson we need to learn.
John Stott: passionate about mission - all his life John Stott served in the church, but he cared not only for the church but for the world. His influence in the London Institute of Contemporary Christianity (LICC), his work with the Langham Partnership and the Lausanne Congress display a care for all people, in all places to hear the good news of Jesus Christ as Lord of all.
John Stott: a faithful church servant - John Stott served in the church and was committed to the denomination into which God called him. He courageously, and wisely, stood up against calls to separate from the CofE and so encouraged others to continue to serve within such denominations.
John Stott: the evangelical leader - I think my favourite book of Stott's is Evangelical Truth, Stott accurately describes the evangelical heritage of the CofE, and with necessary changes also the CofS! Sub titles 'A personal plea for unity' Stott writes:
Today, however, many of us evangelical Christians acquiesce too readily in our pathological tendency to fragment. We take refuge in our convictions about the invisible unity of the church, as if its visible manifestation did not matter. In consequence, the devil has been hugely successful in his old strategy to 'divide and conquer'. Our disunity remains a major hindrance to our evangelism. (page 141)
O for a leader to speak these words with power into the lives of evangelicals in our day.
It is good for us to give thanks to God for such servants as John Stott has been among us. But we will best remember John Stott by our faithfully serving the same Lord as he served in all his ministry and life.
In my opinion John Stott has been the most significant evangelical leader of the twentieth century and I want to offer a few comments of thanks for his ministry.
John Stott: a careful bible student - John Stott's contributions to the Bible Speaks Today series should be well known and well used by preachers and bible teachers. They display a slow and careful reading of the text of Scripture, set in its context and then applied to our lives today. Stott regularly pursues words through lexical study and concordance study to bring a full and clear sense of the word into his exposition of the passage.
John Stott: a reader of our culture - John Stott promoted double listening, a listening to the Bible as God's word and also a listening to the world, the culture so that the preacher might speak God's word into their culture with precision and power. The Bible in one hand and the newspaper in the other is a lesson we need to learn.
John Stott: passionate about mission - all his life John Stott served in the church, but he cared not only for the church but for the world. His influence in the London Institute of Contemporary Christianity (LICC), his work with the Langham Partnership and the Lausanne Congress display a care for all people, in all places to hear the good news of Jesus Christ as Lord of all.
John Stott: a faithful church servant - John Stott served in the church and was committed to the denomination into which God called him. He courageously, and wisely, stood up against calls to separate from the CofE and so encouraged others to continue to serve within such denominations.
John Stott: the evangelical leader - I think my favourite book of Stott's is Evangelical Truth, Stott accurately describes the evangelical heritage of the CofE, and with necessary changes also the CofS! Sub titles 'A personal plea for unity' Stott writes:
Today, however, many of us evangelical Christians acquiesce too readily in our pathological tendency to fragment. We take refuge in our convictions about the invisible unity of the church, as if its visible manifestation did not matter. In consequence, the devil has been hugely successful in his old strategy to 'divide and conquer'. Our disunity remains a major hindrance to our evangelism. (page 141)
O for a leader to speak these words with power into the lives of evangelicals in our day.
It is good for us to give thanks to God for such servants as John Stott has been among us. But we will best remember John Stott by our faithfully serving the same Lord as he served in all his ministry and life.
Thursday, 23 June 2011
First Word on The Last Word
I'm reading Brian McLaren's The Last Word and the Word After That, which I know will cause some of you to stop reading already ... your loss then!
In his commentary on the text I found the following which I offer with only one brief comment of my own:
Regarding homosexuality and the polarization it is causing in the Christian community, I would ask two sets of questions, one of each side:
If you take the "conservative" position, assuming you are right, how do you believe homosexual people should be treated? Should they be constantly shamed? Made to live in secret or hiding? Deprived of basic human rights, equal pay, housing, and so on? Accepted, but on some second-class status that would treat them differenly from other people? And if you cannot accept homosexual people in your midst, can you accept those who do, or must you reject (on some level) both homosexual people and those who accept them?
If you take the "liberal" position, assuming you are right, how do you recommed we decide what is right or wrong sexually? Does "anything go," and if not, how do we decide how to identify any sexual behaviour as wrong - on what basis? What are the personal and social consequences of a lack of moral clarity on sexual issues, and how can those consequences be avoided or dealt with? And if you accept and affirm gay people, how will you deal with those whose conscience will not allow them to do so? Does your acceptance of gays require a rejection of those who do not agree with you, and if not, how will the difference be dealth with? (page 254-255)
My brief comment: does anyone else think having meetings in Scotland to answer these questions would be better than the meetings we are presently organising and being invited to?
In his commentary on the text I found the following which I offer with only one brief comment of my own:
Regarding homosexuality and the polarization it is causing in the Christian community, I would ask two sets of questions, one of each side:
If you take the "conservative" position, assuming you are right, how do you believe homosexual people should be treated? Should they be constantly shamed? Made to live in secret or hiding? Deprived of basic human rights, equal pay, housing, and so on? Accepted, but on some second-class status that would treat them differenly from other people? And if you cannot accept homosexual people in your midst, can you accept those who do, or must you reject (on some level) both homosexual people and those who accept them?
If you take the "liberal" position, assuming you are right, how do you recommed we decide what is right or wrong sexually? Does "anything go," and if not, how do we decide how to identify any sexual behaviour as wrong - on what basis? What are the personal and social consequences of a lack of moral clarity on sexual issues, and how can those consequences be avoided or dealt with? And if you accept and affirm gay people, how will you deal with those whose conscience will not allow them to do so? Does your acceptance of gays require a rejection of those who do not agree with you, and if not, how will the difference be dealth with? (page 254-255)
My brief comment: does anyone else think having meetings in Scotland to answer these questions would be better than the meetings we are presently organising and being invited to?
Tuesday, 21 June 2011
Tom Wright For Everyone
Stephen Kuhrt has done us a great service in this short book on Tom Wright.
Yes, it is too early to offer a fully rounded reflection on Tom Wright's work, however, this is a very valuable book.
I especially like Stephen's focus upon the impact the theology of Tom Wright has had upon the local church. This is where all good theology should impact. Many who read this blog will find the final three chapters of this book helpful and challenging.
In his chapter summarising Tom Wright's theology, under the heading 'Gospel', Stephen writes,
According to Wright, the gospel does not refer to the means by which individuals can be 'saved' and 'go to heaven when they die'. It refers to the royal proclamation that in and through Jesus, declared by his resurrection to be Messiah and Lord, YHWH the God of Israel has become King and begun his processs of putting his world right. Wright shows how this understanding is completely consistent with the original use of the term 'good news' in Isaiah 40:9 and 52:7, with its implicit challenge to that term being used in a similar way by pagan emperors. An integral part of this gospel proclamation is that through the coming of God's Spirit everyone, without restriction, is summoned to be part of this renewed world that he is remaking. (page 48)
I think this is an excellent summary of what Wright means by the 'gospel' and shows how Wright then goes onto rework our Christian hope, our understanding of justification, the implications of creation and redemption. Make no mistake, Tom Wright's theology is a big project, dealing with the big themes of our Christian faith.
Stephen Kuhrt's book is a good one. If you read it I hope it inspires you to go on and read Wright: both Tom and NT!
Yes, it is too early to offer a fully rounded reflection on Tom Wright's work, however, this is a very valuable book.
I especially like Stephen's focus upon the impact the theology of Tom Wright has had upon the local church. This is where all good theology should impact. Many who read this blog will find the final three chapters of this book helpful and challenging.
In his chapter summarising Tom Wright's theology, under the heading 'Gospel', Stephen writes,
According to Wright, the gospel does not refer to the means by which individuals can be 'saved' and 'go to heaven when they die'. It refers to the royal proclamation that in and through Jesus, declared by his resurrection to be Messiah and Lord, YHWH the God of Israel has become King and begun his processs of putting his world right. Wright shows how this understanding is completely consistent with the original use of the term 'good news' in Isaiah 40:9 and 52:7, with its implicit challenge to that term being used in a similar way by pagan emperors. An integral part of this gospel proclamation is that through the coming of God's Spirit everyone, without restriction, is summoned to be part of this renewed world that he is remaking. (page 48)
I think this is an excellent summary of what Wright means by the 'gospel' and shows how Wright then goes onto rework our Christian hope, our understanding of justification, the implications of creation and redemption. Make no mistake, Tom Wright's theology is a big project, dealing with the big themes of our Christian faith.
Stephen Kuhrt's book is a good one. If you read it I hope it inspires you to go on and read Wright: both Tom and NT!
Friday, 3 June 2011
Christ is ascended on high
Lord God,
Father, Son and Holy Spirit,
to you be all glory and praise.
Father God,
from everlasting to everlasting,
enthroned in glory beyond imagination.
Fill the temple of our bodies
with the glory of your holy presence.
Humble us before the beauty
of your uncreated majesty.
Receive our praise,
O God, our King.
Lord Jesus Christ,
a dying Saviour,
and risen Lord.
Our eyes did not see you ascend to your Father,
by faith we see you there,
at his right hand,
your Father and our Father.
From your throne of glory,
extend your reign over all creation,
may your Kingdom come.
Accept us as citizens of your Kingdom,
guide our service in your Kingdom,
lead us in your triumph.
Receive our praise,
O Christ, our King.
Holy Spirit,
Lord and giver of life,
promise of the Father,
gift of the ascended Son.
Make us one with our King
as you work in our hearts.
Reveal the power of the King
in our sin weakened lives;
display the glory of the King
through our renewed and forgiven lives.
Make known to us Christ,
enthroned at the Father’s right hand.
Receive our praise,
O Spirit, our King.
Father, Son and Holy Spirit,
to you be all glory and praise.
Father God,
from everlasting to everlasting,
enthroned in glory beyond imagination.
Fill the temple of our bodies
with the glory of your holy presence.
Humble us before the beauty
of your uncreated majesty.
Receive our praise,
O God, our King.
Lord Jesus Christ,
a dying Saviour,
and risen Lord.
Our eyes did not see you ascend to your Father,
by faith we see you there,
at his right hand,
your Father and our Father.
From your throne of glory,
extend your reign over all creation,
may your Kingdom come.
Accept us as citizens of your Kingdom,
guide our service in your Kingdom,
lead us in your triumph.
Receive our praise,
O Christ, our King.
Holy Spirit,
Lord and giver of life,
promise of the Father,
gift of the ascended Son.
Make us one with our King
as you work in our hearts.
Reveal the power of the King
in our sin weakened lives;
display the glory of the King
through our renewed and forgiven lives.
Make known to us Christ,
enthroned at the Father’s right hand.
Receive our praise,
O Spirit, our King.
Thursday, 2 June 2011
The Journey
The Journey is the eighth album by Stuart Townend, one of the most popular Christian hymn writers of our generation.
Those who know his most recent albums:
2 disc The Best of Stuart Townend
There Is A Hope
Creation Sings
will be in for a surprise with this set. There are none of the loud electric chords, none of the easy to learn by average congregation songs that we've grown to know and love. This disc is indeed a journey, a journey into at times folk, celtic, cajin, roots styles of music. The style may be different but it's still worship.
The second track 'O my soul, arise and bless your maker' is a wonderful version of a track which appears on disc 1 of the Best of Stuart Towned. Given a lively, fresh make over this is a super track.
Then 'By Faith', which I awared worship song of the year 2009. Compare this version with that on Awaken The Dawn by Keith and Kirstyn Getty and you'll see the difference. Gone are the striden, marching beats of this confident song to be replaced with a happy accoustic rhythm which I don't think does justice to the song.
I like 'Vagabonds' and and 'You rescued us' and really enjoy the reworking of the old favourite 'It Is Well With My Soul'. The Celtic influences come out strongly on 'Christ Be In My Waking'.
All in all a good set, but different from previous discs.
Read what Stuart has to say about The Journey - here.
Those who know his most recent albums:
2 disc The Best of Stuart Townend
There Is A Hope
Creation Sings
will be in for a surprise with this set. There are none of the loud electric chords, none of the easy to learn by average congregation songs that we've grown to know and love. This disc is indeed a journey, a journey into at times folk, celtic, cajin, roots styles of music. The style may be different but it's still worship.
The second track 'O my soul, arise and bless your maker' is a wonderful version of a track which appears on disc 1 of the Best of Stuart Towned. Given a lively, fresh make over this is a super track.
Then 'By Faith', which I awared worship song of the year 2009. Compare this version with that on Awaken The Dawn by Keith and Kirstyn Getty and you'll see the difference. Gone are the striden, marching beats of this confident song to be replaced with a happy accoustic rhythm which I don't think does justice to the song.
I like 'Vagabonds' and and 'You rescued us' and really enjoy the reworking of the old favourite 'It Is Well With My Soul'. The Celtic influences come out strongly on 'Christ Be In My Waking'.
All in all a good set, but different from previous discs.
Read what Stuart has to say about The Journey - here.
Monday, 30 May 2011
Love Shine Through
I've been listening to the new Tim Hughes album Love Shine Through and would recommend it to you all.
This set doesn't have the same energy as the live Happy Days disc, but the quality of the song writing and the music more than make up.
I especially like the thread running through the disc focusing about the 'name' - God's name, his name.
The opening track 'Counting On Your Name':
first line - 'My name is written on your hands' matches the chorus 'I'm counting on Your name'. My name and all that I am depending upon Your name and all that you are.
Mid way through, 'At Your Name [Forever]' we are encouraged to shout the name of the Lord, Yahweh, the endless name that deserves endless praise. And this song, co-written with the excellend Phil Wickham closes the set at the end of the disc.
You can't do better than meditate upon God's name and Tim's music will help you do this. So a big thanks to Tim, and everyone else - buy the disc and worship his Name.
This set doesn't have the same energy as the live Happy Days disc, but the quality of the song writing and the music more than make up.
I especially like the thread running through the disc focusing about the 'name' - God's name, his name.
The opening track 'Counting On Your Name':
first line - 'My name is written on your hands' matches the chorus 'I'm counting on Your name'. My name and all that I am depending upon Your name and all that you are.
Mid way through, 'At Your Name [Forever]' we are encouraged to shout the name of the Lord, Yahweh, the endless name that deserves endless praise. And this song, co-written with the excellend Phil Wickham closes the set at the end of the disc.
You can't do better than meditate upon God's name and Tim's music will help you do this. So a big thanks to Tim, and everyone else - buy the disc and worship his Name.
Sunday, 29 May 2011
A General Assembly Statement
The following statement was made by David Arnott, the Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, on Monday 23 May.
I think it is a very helpful statement and deserves to be widely known, so I am copying it here and invite you to pass it on to others.
Statement from Right Reverend David Arnott, Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland on the Special Commission into Same Sex Relationships and the Ministry
As you will be aware by now the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland today (Monday, 23 May 2011) voted to establish a theological commission that will further explore issues around same sex relationships of the ministry of the Church.
The General Assembly held a full and open debate on this issue and I want to thank all commissioners for the courteous and compassionate way in which this was carried out.
I am conscious that this has been a matter of contention for some time and many people on all sides hold their beliefs very firmly.
It is, of course, too early to say what the impact of today's decision will be but we as the National Church will continue to provide guidance and spiritual leadership for the people of Scotland.
Yesterday I had the privilege and pleasure of attending an event called Roll Away the Stone in Princes Street Gardens in Edinburgh. This was a wonderful and happy occasion attended by thousands of people who celebrated and worshipped together in glorious sunshine. That is the true face of the Church of Scotland.
I want to clarify what happened today as best I can.
The Church has agreed to embark on a path that will allow us in two years time to consider lifting the moratorium on acceptance for training and ordination of people in a same sex relationship.
This direction is one that explores inclusion but the new theological commission will report in two years time on that matter and no decisions have yet been made.
We very much hope that people who disagree with what has been decided will nevertheless remain in the Church and work with us as we seek to find a way forward.
Indeed I have had many expressions from commissioners today that they are willing to work for the greater good of the Church.
The existing moratorium on the ordination of ministers in same sex relationships is continued until 2013 so nothing will happen immediately. Importantly, the dialogue will continue.
I am aware that many people will be hurting today and the Church of Scotland has a pastoral duty to look after all our people and show them our love and compassion.
Today has been a challenging day for the Church of Scotland but our history shows that we are able to take on board many challenges and continue to be a clear voice in 21st century Scotland.
I think it is a very helpful statement and deserves to be widely known, so I am copying it here and invite you to pass it on to others.
Statement from Right Reverend David Arnott, Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland on the Special Commission into Same Sex Relationships and the Ministry
As you will be aware by now the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland today (Monday, 23 May 2011) voted to establish a theological commission that will further explore issues around same sex relationships of the ministry of the Church.
The General Assembly held a full and open debate on this issue and I want to thank all commissioners for the courteous and compassionate way in which this was carried out.
I am conscious that this has been a matter of contention for some time and many people on all sides hold their beliefs very firmly.
It is, of course, too early to say what the impact of today's decision will be but we as the National Church will continue to provide guidance and spiritual leadership for the people of Scotland.
Yesterday I had the privilege and pleasure of attending an event called Roll Away the Stone in Princes Street Gardens in Edinburgh. This was a wonderful and happy occasion attended by thousands of people who celebrated and worshipped together in glorious sunshine. That is the true face of the Church of Scotland.
I want to clarify what happened today as best I can.
The Church has agreed to embark on a path that will allow us in two years time to consider lifting the moratorium on acceptance for training and ordination of people in a same sex relationship.
This direction is one that explores inclusion but the new theological commission will report in two years time on that matter and no decisions have yet been made.
We very much hope that people who disagree with what has been decided will nevertheless remain in the Church and work with us as we seek to find a way forward.
Indeed I have had many expressions from commissioners today that they are willing to work for the greater good of the Church.
The existing moratorium on the ordination of ministers in same sex relationships is continued until 2013 so nothing will happen immediately. Importantly, the dialogue will continue.
I am aware that many people will be hurting today and the Church of Scotland has a pastoral duty to look after all our people and show them our love and compassion.
Today has been a challenging day for the Church of Scotland but our history shows that we are able to take on board many challenges and continue to be a clear voice in 21st century Scotland.
Wednesday, 18 May 2011
20 years ago
20 years ago Rangers won 3 in a row.
This year Rangers have won 3 in a row.
20 years ago the manager left and the number 2 stepped up.
Graeme Souness for Walter Smith.
This year it will be Walter Smith for Ally McCoist.
20 years ago a Rangers striker that used to play for Celtic, Mo Johnston, left the club.
This year a Rangers striker that used to play for Celtic, Kenny Miller, left the club.
20 years ago Rangers won the league cup 2-1 in extra time v Celtic.
This year Rangers won the league cup 2-1 in extra time v Celtic.
20 years ago Rangers had 3 players sent off in a cup game at P*rkhead which they lost.
This year Rangers had 3 players sent off in a cup game at P*rkhead which they lost.
20 Years ago Rangers lost 0-3 at Parkhead and still won the league.
This year Rangers lost 0-3 at Parkhead and still won the league.
20 years ago Motherwell were managed by an ex-Rangers midfielder.
This year Motherwell are managed by an ex-Rangers midfielder.
20 years ago Celtic had already gone 2 years without a trophy.
This year Celtic have already gone 2 years without a trophy.
20 years ago Motherwell won the Scottish Cup....................
And finally...
Celtic have never won the Scottish Cup when they've put Rangers out !!!!
This year Rangers have won 3 in a row.
20 years ago the manager left and the number 2 stepped up.
Graeme Souness for Walter Smith.
This year it will be Walter Smith for Ally McCoist.
20 years ago a Rangers striker that used to play for Celtic, Mo Johnston, left the club.
This year a Rangers striker that used to play for Celtic, Kenny Miller, left the club.
20 years ago Rangers won the league cup 2-1 in extra time v Celtic.
This year Rangers won the league cup 2-1 in extra time v Celtic.
20 years ago Rangers had 3 players sent off in a cup game at P*rkhead which they lost.
This year Rangers had 3 players sent off in a cup game at P*rkhead which they lost.
20 Years ago Rangers lost 0-3 at Parkhead and still won the league.
This year Rangers lost 0-3 at Parkhead and still won the league.
20 years ago Motherwell were managed by an ex-Rangers midfielder.
This year Motherwell are managed by an ex-Rangers midfielder.
20 years ago Celtic had already gone 2 years without a trophy.
This year Celtic have already gone 2 years without a trophy.
20 years ago Motherwell won the Scottish Cup....................
And finally...
Celtic have never won the Scottish Cup when they've put Rangers out !!!!
Sunday, 24 April 2011
The Ressurection of the Lord Jesus
You knew it was coming, and here it is, Tyndale House scholars examine the resurrection of the Lord Jesus ...
Thursday, 21 April 2011
Video on the Crucifixion of the Lord Jesus
The second of three Tyndale House films, well worth watching ..
Monday, 18 April 2011
Video on the trial of Jesus
Here is the first of three films from Tyndale House examining the evidence for the biblical accounts of Easter.
Friday, 14 January 2011
Luther and Scripture
Another volume from last year. I bought this one at a Rutherford House Dogmatics Conference a few years ago and was really pleased to have read it last autumn. I've got a number of pages of notes from this book which will appear in time.
Lohse, responding to the many volumes on Luther and his theology, opens with a section on presuppositions relative to a description of Luther's theology. Part 2 sets Luther's theology in its historical development and then Part 3 Luther's theology in its systematic context.
Writing on the psalms lectures:
The sginificance of Scripture for Luther is particularly evident in this word: "The strength of Scripture is this, that it is not changed into him who studies it, but that it transforms its lover into itself and its strengths ... Because you will not change me into what you are .. but you will be changed into what I am." (page 52 - the quote from Luther is from his comments on Ps 67:14)
We, the reader, do not transform the words on the page of Scripture into God's word when it suits us, or when they 'speak to me'. The nature of Scripture is such that contact with Scripture will change the one who loves it. I like this bit, reading Scripture as one who does not love it will not result in change, there is an appropriate way to read, to approach Scripture. The lover of Scripture is transformed by it.
The last bit may cause concern, however, what is Scripture? Scripture is God's gracious self-revelation. So, if Scripture changes its lovers into itself, it will change us into the likeness of the God who is revealed in Scripture. It makes us like Christ. We do not worship Scripture but the God revealed in Scripture and so by Scripture we become like him - his image increasingly clearly displayed in us.
Lohse, responding to the many volumes on Luther and his theology, opens with a section on presuppositions relative to a description of Luther's theology. Part 2 sets Luther's theology in its historical development and then Part 3 Luther's theology in its systematic context.
Writing on the psalms lectures:
The sginificance of Scripture for Luther is particularly evident in this word: "The strength of Scripture is this, that it is not changed into him who studies it, but that it transforms its lover into itself and its strengths ... Because you will not change me into what you are .. but you will be changed into what I am." (page 52 - the quote from Luther is from his comments on Ps 67:14)
We, the reader, do not transform the words on the page of Scripture into God's word when it suits us, or when they 'speak to me'. The nature of Scripture is such that contact with Scripture will change the one who loves it. I like this bit, reading Scripture as one who does not love it will not result in change, there is an appropriate way to read, to approach Scripture. The lover of Scripture is transformed by it.
The last bit may cause concern, however, what is Scripture? Scripture is God's gracious self-revelation. So, if Scripture changes its lovers into itself, it will change us into the likeness of the God who is revealed in Scripture. It makes us like Christ. We do not worship Scripture but the God revealed in Scripture and so by Scripture we become like him - his image increasingly clearly displayed in us.
The purpose of the Spirit's coming
Last year I read this great book by Gordon Fee 'God's Empowering Presence: The Holy Spirit in the Letters of Paul'.
Fee is one of our most gifted scholars and expositors and most of this book is a very careful and detailed exposition of all the passages where Paul writes of the Holy Spirit.
I love this quote from the opening section, where writing on 1 Cor 2:4-5 Fee writes,
The purpose of the Spirit's coming was not to transport one above the present age, but to empower one to live within it. (page 98)
If your spirituality is about getting out of this world it isn't a biblical spirituality. Give thanks for the gift of God's Spirit enabling us to live together with him under the sun.
Fee is one of our most gifted scholars and expositors and most of this book is a very careful and detailed exposition of all the passages where Paul writes of the Holy Spirit.
I love this quote from the opening section, where writing on 1 Cor 2:4-5 Fee writes,
The purpose of the Spirit's coming was not to transport one above the present age, but to empower one to live within it. (page 98)
If your spirituality is about getting out of this world it isn't a biblical spirituality. Give thanks for the gift of God's Spirit enabling us to live together with him under the sun.
Thursday, 13 January 2011
e100
As part of our biblefresh year our congregations are taking on the e100 (Essential 100) bible reading challenge.
100 essential passages of the bible have been chosen and the challenge is to read them in one year.
I have planned a preaching programme for morning services based on these passages and we are using them in our mid-week meetings. We are planning to hold e100 evening services once each month, our first one is on Sunday 30 Jan - Begin At The Beginning, at which we will look at Genesis and invite questions and discussion on themes arising from this important biblical book.
Why not have a look at the e100 web site for yourself - e100
Wednesday, 12 January 2011
One Year On
It is one year on from the devastating earthquake in Haiti. The media circus has moved onto other things, but we will not forget.
We will not forget to pray, to give, to care.
Why not watch this Tearfund video and pray for the people of Haiti.
We will not forget to pray, to give, to care.
Why not watch this Tearfund video and pray for the people of Haiti.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)